I need to do a small motor skill, large motor skill, and intellectual activity tomorrow, and I need to make a lesson plan. I am planning on teaching sport stacking and doing a relay race for a large motor skill (brief instruction...only doing the 3-3-3-3) stack, nothing beyond the 3.
I need a fine motor skill and an intellectual activity. Any ideas?|||For you i will post some links
the first is for fine motor skills
and the second for understanding intellectual activity which will help solve your needs..
sorry if its a bit late and hope it helps..
Love Always|||where the heck do you go to school?
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
I am on the school track team. How would I go about training to get better at sprinting?
...Like sprinting in the 100 meter race, relay race, or hurdles race.|||Speed depends on how hard you can hit the ground compared to how much you weigh. At top speed its like a pogo stick with short contact times Focus on getting stronger so you don't collapse at the ankle/knee at ground contact. Try altitude drops where you jump off a chair and land on the balls of your feet, knees slightly bent. Do a few reps at first until you get used to the forces of landing. As you get stronger land on one leg or hold weights.
Should I run with a constant speed or a charging speed when running?
I'm running in a 400m race. This race is not a relay race. If the answer is running at a constant speed please tell me more about where should I speed up (which what I was trying to ask for was, more details about the race) I would really won't want to let my team down. Thank You.
Ps: My race will start in 2 days.|||For this you really have to know your body and how long you can endure. If you are a runner I'm sure you know.
Start at charging speed for the first 3-5 seconds, then revert to your normal running speed. Maintain speed for the majority of the race.
You should know how long it takes you to burn out in a sprint, when you reach that distance from the finish line start sprinting.
If you started too early and you start burning out too soon before the finish line you'll have to use adrenaline and determination to ensure that you stay at your top speed, even if you'll be huffing, wheezing, feeling dizzy, whatever may come. There's only that small distance left to the finish line, give it every last drop of your effort and you can rest afterwards.
Other than that make sure your endurance is up enough to maintain a fast average speed during the race.
Ps: My race will start in 2 days.|||For this you really have to know your body and how long you can endure. If you are a runner I'm sure you know.
Start at charging speed for the first 3-5 seconds, then revert to your normal running speed. Maintain speed for the majority of the race.
You should know how long it takes you to burn out in a sprint, when you reach that distance from the finish line start sprinting.
If you started too early and you start burning out too soon before the finish line you'll have to use adrenaline and determination to ensure that you stay at your top speed, even if you'll be huffing, wheezing, feeling dizzy, whatever may come. There's only that small distance left to the finish line, give it every last drop of your effort and you can rest afterwards.
Other than that make sure your endurance is up enough to maintain a fast average speed during the race.
How can a world championship event not be decided by a goal? PK's is not an acceptable way to end a game?
I just find it amazing that a world championship in any true sport can be decided not on the field of play, but by something as arbitrary as penalty kicks. I don't understand howyou work your a$$ off for 4 years, play countless matches and then can't play until the final game is decided on the field.
You constantly hearthat the players would be too fatigued to go on until a goal is scored, well so what that would bring conditoining and smart substitutions into it, not the luck of a pk. Why not just have a team relay race dribbling the ball from one side of the field to the other to decide the match. Why not have a contest to see which goalie can punt the ball the farthest to decide a champion?
If the greatest athletes in the world, playing for the championship for their sport can't run until a conclusion, then allow additional substitutes for each additional OT, or start taking players off the field for each OT.|||I find shoot outs unfair (and unexciting) as well. This sounds ridiculous but they should take out the goal keepers in extra time. That would really test the defence of each team and make it easier for them to break the tie.|||I wanna say 2 things...
1. you're completely right, the golden goal or sudden death was a way better solution than penalties, particularly in WC !
2. To js3971. PLEASE, don't compare "soccer", which IS actually Football, to "your football", which is actually a modified copy of Rugby ! ! !
NO COMPARISON ! ! !
Sorry for the personal message...|||It can still show hard wok from the players. I mean if top teams aren't scoring they're obviously busting their asses to keep goals from happening.|||actually, that doesn't sound that unreasonable... i mean playing on, (but don't take the players out.) not the idea about a dribbleing race or a goalie punt, that woudl be just as bad. pks are the worst way to end a match (beside the dribbling and the punting thing). They also need to do somethng about the system of refing, because that clearly doesn't work either. You could do like a golden goal, but i think that they do it because it would take way too long to decide it that way, or at least they think so, and it could take way too long.|||Well, it's soccer. If they didn't have penalty kicks, the game could last a century without anyone scoring.
But at the same time, could you imagine American football breaking a tie by allowing one player to go one on one against another player from scrimmage. It would make a mockery of the game.|||Have you ever played futbol? If you havent, you can start looking for a team in your area and then you will understand why the penalties.|||any true sport? if thats how you feel mate then dont watch football, the rules are the rules and no one knows penalty heartbreakers better than us english. two hours of play is long enough, if you want a nice long game then watch cricket
You constantly hearthat the players would be too fatigued to go on until a goal is scored, well so what that would bring conditoining and smart substitutions into it, not the luck of a pk. Why not just have a team relay race dribbling the ball from one side of the field to the other to decide the match. Why not have a contest to see which goalie can punt the ball the farthest to decide a champion?
If the greatest athletes in the world, playing for the championship for their sport can't run until a conclusion, then allow additional substitutes for each additional OT, or start taking players off the field for each OT.|||I find shoot outs unfair (and unexciting) as well. This sounds ridiculous but they should take out the goal keepers in extra time. That would really test the defence of each team and make it easier for them to break the tie.|||I wanna say 2 things...
1. you're completely right, the golden goal or sudden death was a way better solution than penalties, particularly in WC !
2. To js3971. PLEASE, don't compare "soccer", which IS actually Football, to "your football", which is actually a modified copy of Rugby ! ! !
NO COMPARISON ! ! !
Sorry for the personal message...|||It can still show hard wok from the players. I mean if top teams aren't scoring they're obviously busting their asses to keep goals from happening.|||actually, that doesn't sound that unreasonable... i mean playing on, (but don't take the players out.) not the idea about a dribbleing race or a goalie punt, that woudl be just as bad. pks are the worst way to end a match (beside the dribbling and the punting thing). They also need to do somethng about the system of refing, because that clearly doesn't work either. You could do like a golden goal, but i think that they do it because it would take way too long to decide it that way, or at least they think so, and it could take way too long.|||Well, it's soccer. If they didn't have penalty kicks, the game could last a century without anyone scoring.
But at the same time, could you imagine American football breaking a tie by allowing one player to go one on one against another player from scrimmage. It would make a mockery of the game.|||Have you ever played futbol? If you havent, you can start looking for a team in your area and then you will understand why the penalties.|||any true sport? if thats how you feel mate then dont watch football, the rules are the rules and no one knows penalty heartbreakers better than us english. two hours of play is long enough, if you want a nice long game then watch cricket
How do i talk to sheriff at the end of cars mater national?
I finished the last relay race and it says go talk to sheriff at the courhouse and he'll tell you to teach more tircks to mater but he isnt there and i looked in radiator springs, ornament vallley, and tailfin pass but he isnt there|||What the heck are you talking about?
And what movie is this?
And what movie is this?
What is the significance of race/sex in the medical field?
I watch a lot of medical shows, and I noticed that the race and sex of the person is used when relaying information over.
I was wondering what the reason for this is. Does anyone know?
I figured it might be so that the people waiting at the ER can be on the look out, but I don't know. I'm curious.|||Certain conditions are more common in some races. Some cultures have certain beliefs which could be important. Some conditions are gender-specific. Pregnancy is a possibility for women of reproductive age.|||I don't know about TV medical shows since that is just Hollywood, but race and sex are important to know because of the prevalence of some diseases. Certain diseases affect black people more, certain diseases affect females more, etc. It is important to know a complete history including these two pieces of information to initiate the proper care of the patient.
I was wondering what the reason for this is. Does anyone know?
I figured it might be so that the people waiting at the ER can be on the look out, but I don't know. I'm curious.|||Certain conditions are more common in some races. Some cultures have certain beliefs which could be important. Some conditions are gender-specific. Pregnancy is a possibility for women of reproductive age.|||I don't know about TV medical shows since that is just Hollywood, but race and sex are important to know because of the prevalence of some diseases. Certain diseases affect black people more, certain diseases affect females more, etc. It is important to know a complete history including these two pieces of information to initiate the proper care of the patient.
Where are all the good movies? Did Hollywood run out of good ideas?
I was just watching trailers on Itunes and noticed that the plots to some of the movies absolutely suck. The most interesting movie on the entire page was The Kings Speech. Then there are movies about kids being kidnapped, super heroes, documentaries about things like a relay race. and even a frickin movie about a swim team. What the hell? What happened to creativity?|||Because its 2011 and people got higher and higher expectations...I mean I think they just fed up with it that they are trying to reach some far reaching goals..I mean they have been having brain freeze..or abnormal diet.
What I really mean is that US owes too much, that movie makers need to make a movie that will 100% successful, because if not then waste of money. That is why I think they are making remakes and trying to improve some of them just to make sure that people will be still interested just like they were on the other original movies.|||They aren't all unoriginal.
If you look there are still great movies coming out movie companies. Look at:
Tucker and Dale Vs Evil
Zombieland
You Don't Mess With The Zohan
Death at a Funeral
Mind you I've only listed comedies, because it would take a book to list every genre. The film-making style has changed and so to must the movies we watch. Just because they aren't carbon-copies, or just because many artists draw from older sources for inspiration, doesn't mean the film is going to be bad. The Jurassic Park series - from a book. The Lion King - rip off of a Japanese cartoon. Avatar - Pocahontas anyone? Many times we copy things without even realizing it. So it's discriminatory to say that "all" new movies are played out and bad .|||I think so. People are always trying to remake good movies because they run out of ideas. Here's an idea: remake BAD movies and make them better! Not very original, but still better. Movies really suck today, that's why I watch mostly old movies, and only the really good new ones.|||TWILIGHT HAPPENED.
Not really. I don't know, it just seems to be all about crappy remakes. They're remaking Ferris Beuller too. That should be awful.
Maybe the screenwriters are stuck in the past or stuck in mainstream land.|||I think they stole each others ideas to make it look good but to me thats totally cheating and that they should be thinking more of their own creative ideas. Maybe that's a reason why more movies are sucking down...............
What I really mean is that US owes too much, that movie makers need to make a movie that will 100% successful, because if not then waste of money. That is why I think they are making remakes and trying to improve some of them just to make sure that people will be still interested just like they were on the other original movies.|||They aren't all unoriginal.
If you look there are still great movies coming out movie companies. Look at:
Tucker and Dale Vs Evil
Zombieland
You Don't Mess With The Zohan
Death at a Funeral
Mind you I've only listed comedies, because it would take a book to list every genre. The film-making style has changed and so to must the movies we watch. Just because they aren't carbon-copies, or just because many artists draw from older sources for inspiration, doesn't mean the film is going to be bad. The Jurassic Park series - from a book. The Lion King - rip off of a Japanese cartoon. Avatar - Pocahontas anyone? Many times we copy things without even realizing it. So it's discriminatory to say that "all" new movies are played out and bad .|||I think so. People are always trying to remake good movies because they run out of ideas. Here's an idea: remake BAD movies and make them better! Not very original, but still better. Movies really suck today, that's why I watch mostly old movies, and only the really good new ones.|||TWILIGHT HAPPENED.
Not really. I don't know, it just seems to be all about crappy remakes. They're remaking Ferris Beuller too. That should be awful.
Maybe the screenwriters are stuck in the past or stuck in mainstream land.|||I think they stole each others ideas to make it look good but to me thats totally cheating and that they should be thinking more of their own creative ideas. Maybe that's a reason why more movies are sucking down...............
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)